Baby from iconic Nirvana album cover claims pic is ‘sexual exploitation’ in $150k lawsuit

Kurt Cobain’s MTV Unplugged guitar sells for $6 million

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Spencer Elden, now 30, is the baby in the image that features on the band’s iconic Nevermind album cover.

The 1991 album cover features a wide shot of a baby floating naked in a pool towards a $1 note.

Mr Elden is suing the band’s surviving members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic as well as Kurt Cobain’s estate over the image and claims he did not give consent to it being used on the cover.

His claims come 30 years after the album’s release, which remains one of the best-selling albums of all time, having sold over 30million copies worldwide.

According to TMZ, Spencer Elden claims he could not consent to his image being used on the album at just 4-months-old, but also said his legal guardians didn’t consent to it either.

He claims that the band violated federal child pornography laws by using the photo and is accusing them of sexual exploitation and seeking legal remuneration.

Mr Elden is suing not only the aforementioned parties but also the artwork photographer Kirk Weddle and designer Robert Fisher.

He has also cited the labels responsible for the album’s release, including Universal Music and Geffen Records; and Nirvana’s drummer at the time, Chad Channing in the documents.

The 30-year-old claims the band made a promise to cover his genitals with a sticker in the image, but this never happened.

He believes the band failed to protect and prevent him from being sexually exploited, and “violated” federal child pornography statutes.

According to court documents obtained by TMZ, Mr Elden says that having his naked body appearing on the famous artwork caused him to suffer “lifelong damages”.

He alleges that the accused “failed to take reasonable steps to protect [him] and prevent his widespread sexual exploitation and image trafficking”.

With the lawsuit, Mr Elden is requesting a trial by jury, and is reportedly seeking damages, attorney fees and an injunction to prohibit all parties from “continuing to engage in the unlawful acts and practices described herein”.

DON’T MISS 
Michael Jackson: Kurt Cobain ‘felt sorry’ for MJ in abuse allegations [INSIGHT] 
The Beatles: Kurt Cobain loved Lennon but was embarrased by McCartney [COMMENT] 
Kurt Cobain’s MTV Unplugged guitar just sold for MILLIONS at auction [REPORT] 

Currently, no representative of Nirvana or Universal Music Group has addressed the claims.

Mr Elden recreated the album artwork in 2016, with the images showing him floating in a pool just like in the snap of him as a child taken by photographer Kirk Weddle.

He also paid homage to the album with a tattoo of its name appearing on his chest, but Mr Elden appears to have had a change in opinion.

A 2008 interview with NPR revealed that Mr Elden’s naked participation was “rather accidental”.

As a friend of photographer Kirk Weddle, Spencer Elden’s father, Rick was invited to the pool photoshoot on a whim, and three months later the family spotted the iconic image featuring the floating child across the wall of a US music store near Sunset Blvd.

In the same interview, Mr Elden referred to his very public image and the fact that “quite a few people in the world have seen my penis” as “kinda cool”.

However, in a 2016 interview with GQ Australia, had a different realisation.

He said: “Recently I’ve been thinking, ‘What if it wasn’t OK with my freaking penis being shown to everybody?’ I didn’t really have a choice”.

Source: Read Full Article