The music producer and husband of Alicia Keys notes in a new interview that he doesn’t think the late rapper got a lot of ‘the…
Historic statues should NOT be pulled down, Arts Council boss Sir Nicholas Serota tells MPs
- Sir Nicholas Serota told MPs controversial artefacts could be ‘reinterpreted’
- Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden has threatened to pull funding from museums
- The government is opposed to removing statues dedicated to slave owners
- Boris Johnson expressed his dismay after slaver Edward Colston was toppled
Historic statues should stay in place despite controversy, but artefacts could be reinterpreted, arts boss Sir Nicholas Serota has said.
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden has previously warned, in a leaked letter, that Government funded museums and galleries risk losing taxpayer support if they remove artefacts.
And Prime Minister Boris Johnson expressed his dismay at the focus on removing statues in the wake of the toppling of the memorial to slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol.
The government has pledged to protect statues of historic Britons with links to the slave trade following the removal of Edward Colston who was thrown into Bristol harbour in June 2020
Black Lives Matter protesters even targeted the statue of Winston Churchill in Parliament Square claiming the former Prime Minister was a ‘racist’
Arts Council chairman Sir Nicholas Serota, pictured, told MPs controversial statues or items should not be removed but could be reinterpreted ‘where it feels appropriate or a new scholarship emerges’
Sir Nicholas, chairman of Arts Council England, told MPs that it is ‘not responsible for protecting cultural property as such’.
But he added: ‘As far as the current Government policy is concerned on such things, we would support the notion of retaining works in place.
‘Within museums… works move all the time and are constantly reinterpreted and we would therefore support that interpretation where it feels appropriate or a new scholarship emerges,’ he told the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
The British Museum previously said that it has ‘no intention of removing controversial objects from display’ – after it was one of many institutions, including Tate galleries, Imperial War museums, National Portrait Gallery, National Museums Liverpool, and the Royal Armouries, to receive the warning letter.
The Government had previously threatened to cut funding to museums or institutions which removed statues in response to protests
It had redisplayed its bust of Hans Sloane, its slave-owning founding father, juxtaposing it with objects to reflect the fact that Sloane’s collection was created in the context of the British Empire and the slave economy.
Arts Council England also told MPs that some small cultural organisations had been surprised to discover they attracted a global audience when putting their content online in the pandemic.
‘One of the great successes of the last year is the way organisations have adapted and taken advantage of working in the digital format,’ former Tate chief Sir Nicholas said.
‘It’s been astonishing for some quite small organisations, the degree to which they have had viewers from elsewhere in the world to watch performances in Leicester or wherever it might be.’
The committee is examining the role played by Arts Council England in the distribution of the initial £1.57 billion Culture Recovery Fund to arts organisations affected by the pandemic. A further £300 million was announced in the 2021 Budget.
Source: Read Full Article